Skip to content
MCQtimes.com
GK
Pakistan Studies
Current Affairs
Islamic Studies
English
MCQtimes.com
Toggle Menu
Research Methodology
Home
/
Research Methodology
- Page 33
Social Research Methods
278
Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS)
90
Show/Hide Answers
Research designs
If a study is “reliable”, this means that:
It was conducted by a reputable researcher who can be trusted
The measures devised for concepts are stable on different occasions
The findings can be generalized to other social settings
The methods are stated clearly enough for the research to be replicated
The essential question about research is its reliability. It is often the case that concepts in the social sciences can be construed differently in different social contexts, so the promise of repeatability makes readers feel the results can be relied on more. But what is even more important is that there should be not much variation (or none at all) in responses to the same instruments by the same type of respondent. Bryman gives the example of wild fluctuations in IQ test scores as an indicator of low reliability of the test itself. When reviewing literature or consulting secondary sources, we are certainly influenced by the reputation, or simply good standing in the academic community, of the researcher. This does not imply uncritical acceptance of their findings, however.
Reference: Bryman: Social Research Methods: 5th Edition Page(s) 41
Author:
rikazzz
Comment
Mixed methods research: combining quantitative and qualitative research
How might quantitative research facilitate qualitative research?
By identifying specific groups of people to be interviewed
By showing the frequency of different responses to a survey item
By imposing a rigorous positivist framework on it
By combining laboratory experiments with structured observation
Similarly, quantitative research can form an important first stage of a qualitative project, by informing the process of sample selection. For example, a survey questionnaire distributed to a large group of people might reveal various different social groups or types of respondent, some of which could be identified as potentially informative interviewees.
Reference: Bryman: Social Research Methods: 5th Edition Page(s) 638,639
Author:
rikazzz
Comment
Getting started: reviewing the literature
Which of the following statements about plagiarism is most accurate?
It is so easy to “copy and paste” from the internet that everyone does it nowadays. If a proper reference is given, where is the harm in that?
How can we say for sure where our own ideas come from exactly? If we tried to give a reference for everything we could never hope to succeed.
Any suggestion that we have written what another actually wrote is morally wrong. Anyway, the whole point of a literature review is to show what we have read and what we thought about it.
Plagiarism is such an awful crime that those found guilty should be obliged to wear a scarlet “P” on their clothing.
Option (d) might be favored by some academics but it is, perhaps, too extreme a punishment for what is undoubtedly a crime. Perpetrating a fraud, or a lie, knowingly is reprehensible and, in the realm of research, may be destructive of others’ work. There is a danger with on-line resources, particularly, to fall victim of the very advantages offered. These include copying and pasting utilities, contained in most computer software packages. Institutional rules vary but most agree on upper limits of the amounts of direct quotation that may be used. It is a lot lower than many students seem to imagine. Another consideration, of no less importance, concerns copyright. Authors and publishers will permit a very small amount of direct quotation if full attribution of the text is given. Larger amounts need express permission.
Reference: Bryman: Social Research Methods: 5th Edition Page(s) 115-11
Author:
rikazzz
Comment
Breaking down the quantitative/qualitative divide
Why does Bryman argue that research methods can be seen as relatively “free-floating” or autonomous?
Because researchers often change their minds about which method to use
Because most qualitative researchers are Hippies who believe in free love
Because there is no longer any meaningful distinction between quantitative and qualitative research
Because there is no inevitable connection between a researcher’s choice of method and their epistemological/ ontological beliefs
If a researcher chooses a particular research method, does that automatically presuppose a commitment to a particular epistemology or ontology? Bryman argues against this on pragmatic grounds (p624/625), pointing out that both quantitative and qualitative methods can be used within a single overall design and that there may be fashions in the predominant use of one type or another. It would not be unthinkable for a ‘post-modernist’ dissertation supervisor to suggest quantitative research methods for a student’s research, nor for a positivist supervisor to recommend ethnography or focus groups.
Reference: Bryman: Social Research Methods: 5th Edition Page(s) 625,626
Author:
rikazzz
Comment
The nature and process of social research
What does ‘sampling cases’ mean?
Sampling using a sampling frame
Identifying people who are suitable for research
An emergency source of finance
Sampling people, newspapers, television programmes etc.
Social research is mostly conducted on people but not exclusively. Newspaper articles and television programmes can also supply useful research data, as can commercial firms and public institutions, for example. A ‘case’ is the general, collective word used for the unit of analysis. Sampling frames are essential if we want to make claims for the general population from our sample, by making sure that each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. That means answer (b) is not just incorrect for this question but for almost every other, unless we mean people who have the appropriate criteria for our research. And as for the brief-case…what, no laptop?
Reference: Bryman: Social Research Methods: 5th Edition Page(s) 9
Author:
rikazzz
Comment
Sampling in qualitative research
The minimum sample size for qualitative interviewing is:
30
31
60
It’s hard to say
Trying to figure out the ‘right’ number of people to interview is almost impossible in theoretical sampling – who can say in advance when the point of theoretical saturation will be reached? On the other hand, if the objective of the research is to make comparisons, then a minimum number should be established. Warren (2002, cited on page 416) says that publishers (and we add: dissertation assessors!) are unlikely to be impressed with a number less than twenty. Bryman (p418) recommends concentrating on your reasons for using a particular sampling strategy and then explaining why you feel a particular sample size is justified. The very nature of qualitative research obliges us to give answer (d) as correct, even though it may not be very helpful!
Reference: Bryman: Social Research Methods: 5th Edition Page(s) 416-418
Author:
rikazzz
Comment
Ethics and politics in social research
Why is it important that personal data about research participants are kept within secure, confidential records?
So that the participants cannot find out what has been written about them
So that individuals, places or organizations cannot be harmed through identification or disclosure of personal information
So that government officials, teachers and other people in authority can have easy access to the data
To enable the researcher to track down individuals and find out more about their lives
When maintaining records of personal information about your participants, it is important that these data are kept in a safe, secure place to which no one but you has access (unless the participants have consented to other arrangements). Participants have the right to see what has been written about them, or which is stored on computer files about them. Much quantitative data can be made anonymous quite easily and, in any event, the identity of the respondent is not a focus of study but in qualitative research this is not as easily done. Great care must be taken with the handling of this data, particularly in the final published reports, so that individuals cannot be identified from their comments or any details about their backgrounds. The UK Data Protection Act of 1998 is referred to in “Tips and skills” on page 128 and can be accessed on-line for further information.
Reference: Bryman: Social Research Methods: 5th Edition Page(s) 128
Author:
rikazzz
Comment
Sampling in quantitative research
A simple random sample is one in which:
From a random starting point, every nth unit from the sampling frame is selected
A non-probability strategy is used, making the results difficult to generalize
The researcher has a certain quota of respondents to fill for various social groups
Every unit of the population has an equal chance of being selected
Once we know the size of the population to be researched, we can determine the size of our sample. This latter number will depend a lot on our resources of time and money. Then we make (or obtain, if one is already available) a sampling frame, from which we select our future respondents, typically using random number tables. This is to ensure that each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected, so there can be no bias in the selection, the result being referred to as a ‘simple’ random sample. If you answered (a) you were probably thinking of a ‘systematic’ sample, a short-cut method of selecting directly from the sampling frame but you must be careful to make sure the frame has not already been ordered in a particular way for another purpose.
Reference: Bryman: Social Research Methods: 5th Edition Page(s) 176,177
Author:
rikazzz
Comment
Content analysis
Which of the following is not an example of a ‘unit of analysis’?
Validity
significant actors
Words
subjects and themes
Units of analysis are the tangible objects or subject matter that are coded as data in content analysis. These might include the people who produced the text as well as the people who figure most prominently in it; the item type, distinguishing between editorial comment and features, for example; the text perspectives and themes; and even actual words, including the frequency of their use. So a unit of analysis means what we study rather than how well we study it.
Reference: Bryman: Social Research Methods: 5th Edition Page(s) 289-292
Author:
rikazzz
Comment
Documents as sources of data
What is semiotics?
The study of semi-detached houses
A half-baked attempt at social research
The method of semi-structured interviewing
The science of signs
Semiotics is a branch of social science research that focuses on the way symbols and signs are used in everyday life. This might involve studying the way visual images function as “signs” in a cultural text (objects and images as well as documents), referring not only to specific objects at a superficial level but also to underlying “deep structures” of the social world. It can be seen as an approach to analysis of data, as well as a subject area in its own right. The word should not be thought of as Latin ‘semi-‘, in the sense of ‘half’, but as Greek ‘sem(e)i-‘, meaning ‘sign’.
Reference: Bryman: Social Research Methods: 5th Edition Page(s) 565
Author:
rikazzz
Comment
Page navigation
Previous Page
Previous
1
…
31
32
33
34
35
…
37
Next Page
Next
Go to Page
Light
Dark
GK
Pakistan Studies
Current Affairs
Islamic Studies
English