What do advocates of narrative analysis prefer to study?

The extent to which analytic induction can be value-free
The iterative process of grounded
The ethical implications of conducting a secondary analysis of qualitative data
The ways in which people use stories to make sense of events in their lives
The ways in which people use stories to make sense of events in their lives  Narrative analysis shifts the focus of attention from the content of people’s accounts to the structures, forms and mechanisms they use to construct them. This can involve studying either the “storied nature” of everyday life as recounted by participants, or the idea that life story data take the form of a jointly produced narrative that emerges from the interview as a situated encounter. It is, at least in part, a reaction to the coding problem (among others) of grounded theory research.
Reference: Bryman: Social Research Methods: 5th Edition Page(s) 589-593

Related posts

What is narrative analysis?
A. A literary approach to documents
B. An approach that is sensitive to questions that concern how people choose to sequence and represent people and events
C. A form of thematic analysis
D. A method of improving the quality of interview material
What is one of the main ethical problems associated with conducting a secondary analysis of qualitative data?
A. The participants may not have given informed consent to the reuse of their data
B. It involves deceiving respondents about the nature of the research
C. The secondary analyst must adopt a covert role and is at risk of “going native”
D. Respondents are likely to experience physical harm as a result of the process
What are memos?
A. Notes that researchers write to themselves
B. Reminders of what is meant by key terms or phrases
C. Building blocks for theorizing
D. All of the above
What do Strauss & Corbin mean by “open coding”?
A. Breaking data down and examining it to identify themes and concepts
B. Coding without the intention of building a theory
C. Drawing open brackets alongside key words and phrases
D. Telling everybody about the way you have coded the data
In analytic induction, what happens if the researcher finds a deviant case?
A. They ignore it and carry on
B. They must either redefine or reformulate the hypothesis
C. They conduct a parametric statistical test
D. They give up and decide to be quantitative researchers instead
Which of the following is not a tool of grounded theory?
A. Theoretical sampling
B. Coding
C. External validity
D. Constant comparison
What is a “substantive theory” in Strauss & Corbin’s view?
A. One that operates at the highest level of abstraction
B. One that is highly controversial and provokes a critical response
C. One that relates to an empirical instance or substantive topic area
D. One that is amenable to statistical analysis

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *